Tuesday, February 09, 2010
Can Bankruptcy Save the Planet?
Tuesday, June 02, 2009
GM is Bankrupt. Now What?
Everybody knows that GM is bankrupt. Many people probably thought it has been for a while. The broader impact is still unknown. Thousands of people will be out of work and see reduced benefits. Where is their bailout? The upsetting part is that individuals have to suck it up and deal with the hardship while companies are too big to fail and have to be rescued.
However painful this is going to be maybe something good will come out of it. I hope at some point that we realize a few important things. GM was an integral part of suburbanization and expansion of our economy. By extension, this created the environmental difficulties and mass consumerism we are currently living with. While many may look at the bankruptcy of GM as a business failure it is actually a social failure. The bankruptcy of GM represents the bankrupt economic model we are currently trying to revive. It is a reflection of our lifestyle. When we awaken to this point then we can move forward to create a sustainable economic model that respects the ideals of democracy and free enterprise.
Wednesday, January 14, 2009
Endangered Elephants
Also check out Save the Elephants
Monday, October 27, 2008
The Future of Food: How Science Will Solve the Next Global Crises.
Wednesday, October 22, 2008
6 Ways to Save Taxes in 2009
Monday, June 23, 2008
Solar Power, War and Oil
Over the weekend an editorial was written by Eric Margolis which has the title of "These wars are about oil, not democracy". He makes this statement since new oil and gas pipeline and development agreements have been signed in Iraq and Afghanistan. I'm sure many people are shocked by this statement because we all believed that weapons of mass destruction existed and that Osama would be caught and brought to trial. It is a good editorial and ties some things together if you didn't already know.
So the wars are about oil. Despite our best efforts to secure new supplies through these wars the cost of crude continues to rise. Gasoline is rising dramatically and the damage to the economy is around the corner. How expensive is the war? Follow this link to the National Priorities Project and it has a running counter. Right now it is over 530 billion dollars. There are more costs that are probably not captured here and we still need to account for the economic and environmental damage.
What could we have done that would have cost less, achieved energy independence and probably not killed thousands of people. Implement a solar grand plan as outlined in Scientific American. Sure it is on a 40 year timeline but aren't we planning to wage the war on terror for as long as it takes anyway?
The bottom line is that until we change our political and economic systems we will continue on the same path.
Thursday, April 24, 2008
All Trails Lead Back to Overpopulation
The only problem I have is with the solution. We either need a lot of people to die or a lot of people to start using/wasting a lot less. Unfortunately, I think the waste reduction will happen after it is too late.
All Trails Lead Back to Overpopulation
Friday, August 24, 2007
Mortgages and the Environment
The recent housing craze has driven consumption higher. This obviously has an environmental impact as we consume more and create more garbage. Rising home prices combined with cheap credit fueled consumption in areas such as cars, plasma televisions, second homes etc. Environmental footprints have increased as a result. The relationship between consumption and outsourcing cannot be ignored and the environmental degradation associated with production in developing countries is well documented.
Despite the tangible impact of consumption I feel there is a greater risk looming. Banks, lenders, hedge funds and other investors made risky investment decisions. Now, the risk is being realized. As with most major business/market failures a government bailout looms. Billions were poured into credit markets. As part of pre-election posturing, billions more will probably be given to homeowners who didn't read the fine print and signed up for mortgages that they could not afford. The risk lies in bailing out bad decisions. What if nuclear power turns out to not be so profitable if a distributed model with renewable energy as the source take over? What happens to all those hybrid batteries? What if tar sands are not viable if we move away from an oil fueled economy? Individuals and companies will be making investments in the environment and the future economy. Should we bail out the bad investments in oil exploration, nuclear power and automobiles after we have already subsidized them?